Saturday 4 September 2021

23rd Sunday in Ordinary Time Year B 2021

This Sunday we continue along a sacramental trajectory which, at first glance, has nothing to do with food. Instead, the focus is provided by the connexion between the 1st Reading and the Gospel whereby the promise of Isaiah’s Messianic age is now fulfilled and witnessed in the ministry of Jesus.

Concretely, Jesus healed a man with both a hearing and a speech impediment. While the nuts and bolts vividly refer to the restoration of two senses in the man, a more implicit focus is actually on the nature of sacramentality. A fitting locus to better appreciate the essential workings of a sacrament is our experience of technology. A quality which permeates our hi-tech universe is the ubiquity of touch. In the case of the all too familiar smudges on our device’s display, think “oleophobic” screen protector that prevents leaving an oily film residue from repeated touching. Furthermore, “haptic” is the technology related to tactile sensation when we interface with our electronic gadgets. The “vibration” from pressing the screen is an example of haptic feedback.

Thus far, our reaction to the pandemic has created an absurdity. We are immersively tactile as apparent through our touch technology. Think vaccination centres where an official has to help a tech-challenge elderly. Fomite transmission is likely when the official touches a possibly contaminated smartphone.[1] At the very least, social distancing is an act which denies the very nature of who we are as tactile creatures. What has been steadily drummed into us is that life is secured through “haphephobic behaviour”.

In view of our proximity and contact anxiety, this miracle which restores the auditory faculty and speech function to the man born deaf and dumb is bold because Jesus stuck His finger into the ears and spat on the man’s tongue. How “earthy” can one get? It is crude, bordering on disgusting, when we contrast this dramatic healing account with the Centurion seeking a cure for his servant. The Centurion’s faith expressed in “Lord, I am not worthy that you should come under my roof but only say the word and my servant will be healed” occasioned a response from a distance.

Fortunately, this rather coarse approach to restoration provides a compelling reminder of the “incarnational” foundation of our sacramental economy. Firstly, the retention of an Aramaic expression “Ephphatha” (“be opened”) in a Gospel written in Greek in a way authenticates the “facticity” of the Incarnation. It is significant that the Evangelist kept the groaning of Jesus in His mother-tongue. Secondly, that the “Word was made flesh” is the basis for our oft-repeated definition of a Sacrament: It is an “outward sign of inward grace”. The Sacraments work through the mediation of outward signs which make them inherently physical, material and “sense-able”. They use elements like oil, water, bread, wine. Sensible gestures are not left out as in the “Rite of Ephphatha” where the celebrant touches the ears and mouth of the infant after the Rite of Baptism. These gestures are derived from the healing action of Jesus[2] in today’s Gospel. Materiality and sensibility, either through natural elements or symbolic gestures, are the media through which Christ effects His salvation. And not only that as we shall see later.

The restoration of hearing is closely linked to the loosening of the tongue. In an atmosphere of fear generated by Covid 19, Jesus is inviting us to hear and also to proclaim. In the 1st Reading, God promised through the Prophet Isaiah to be with us. In the Gospel, Jesus is Emmanuel fulfilled. Under this tyrannical terror of Covid anxiety, can we hear Him and have we confidence in His promise of salvation?

Whether we like it or not, we have become terrified of an essentially human feature. Deeply suspicious of touch, we view our sacramental nature not as a strength but a mortal weakness[3]. We console and comfort ourselves that we can happily ease into this “new normal”, when in fact, it is a myth as we continue to suppress the very quality or feature that makes us alive.

Given that God has assured us that we will not be left to our own devices, the challenge now is to address this overwhelming fear that has invaded our sacramental space or constitution and has kept us locked in. Can we recover our confidence that touch is healing? The way forward is to be found in appreciating what it means to be “touched” by God.

There are layers “contact” or more appropriately, levels of “touching”. God is omnipresent and He can touch us even if we are not physically present in Church. He touches us through Sacred Scriptures, prayers, the homily when we attend an online Mass. This forms the basis for our spiritual preparation in the drive-through Holy Communion. Our initiative in providing the Blessed Sacrament to those who are spiritually prepared is supported by the Gospel today. Now Jesus touches us physically through the Sacraments because every Sacrament is the action of Christ Himself effected through the ministers of the Church. We are not pure spirits but are embodied beings. Thus, redemption is mediated because the body is to be saved.

While the Gospel clearly illustrates that the physical healing of the man was restorative, there is, however, a deeper impairment. Physical impairment is not as limiting as psychological or spiritual impediment. Hopefully, the physical restoration of this sense-impaired man allows us to see how deaf and dumb we can be when our paranoia is psychological and our dis-ease spiritual. A way to recover our confidence in God is to remember that the only way we can fully live is not to be afraid of death. This globalisation of paranoia must be illuminated by the promise of God that the Resurrection restores us to the life promised to us. In this, we may have unwittingly operated with a mentality of repudiation in which we forget the past where God has shown Himself to be trustworthy. The Israelites crossing the Red Sea prefigured the greatest crossing. Christ Himself “crossed” death to reach the Resurrection. Through His death, He paved the way for our dying and crossing. Death in a pandemic must still be contextualised with the promise of the Resurrection.

At the start, I mentioned that at first glance, the trajectory of the Gospel has nothing to do with food. But it has. To save us, God touches us to the core of our being. Therefore it is right to state that Jesus is never far from our salvation or we are never far from being saved by Him. In this new age of the Church[4] Jesus acts through the Sacraments to bring us the salvation which He guaranteed through Isaiah and effected in the healing touch of the man born deaf and dumb. For us, in the Sacrament of the Eucharist, Jesus is the fulfilment of the assurance made before the Ascension that He will be with us till the end of time. In conclusion, presuming that one is spiritually prepared, the reception of Holy Communion by means of the drive through initiative brings out clearly the aspect of the Eucharist as truly Viaticum—He touches us. Fear not for He will always be with us along the way until we have arrived at our eternal destination.



[1] Headphones and headsets. Anything which is shared is possible fomite transmission.

[2]The Lord Jesus made the deaf hear and the dumb speak. May He soon touch your ears to receive His word, and your mouth to proclaim His faith, the praise and glory of God the Father. Amen”.

[3] If we think about it, it does not make sense. How can mortality which is “essential” OF our nature be considered a weakness? We are mortal beings as the philosopher Heidegger reminds—beings unto death. Every breath is one breath to death. It should be viewed not as a weakness but rather as path toward freedom.

[4] Definitely not the New Age that believes that the “self” is the saviour a la self-help etc.